- Processing Talk
- Compare
- PM 50W vs F2 Ultra MOPA 60W
Acmer PM 50W vs xTool F2 Ultra MOPA 60W
What PM 50W does better (1) and where F2 Ultra MOPA 60W wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Power & cutting7.2
4.7Safety8.9
5.6Features & ease of use7.7
Why is PM 50W better than F2 Ultra MOPA 60W?
- Autofocus / auto heightYes · F2 Ultra MOPA 60W: No
Why is F2 Ultra MOPA 60W better than PM 50W?
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · PM 50W: Yes
- Built-in cameraNo · PM 50W: Yes
- Laser output power50 W vs 60 W+20%
- Two laser sourcesNo · PM 50W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm), Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | Yes |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 50 W | 60 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 200 × 200 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 200 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 200 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 400 cm² | — |
| Conveyor / roll feeder support | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Flame / fire detection | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | LightBurn | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 470 mm | — |
| Depth | 350 mm | — |
| Height | 610 mm | — |
| Weight | 23 kg | — |
