- Processing Talk
- Compare
- PM 50W vs GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60W
Acmer PM 50W vs Monport GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60W
What PM 50W does better (3) and where GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60W wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Power & cutting7.2
4.9Speed4.9
7.8Work area7.1
4.7Safety4.7
5.6Features & ease of use5.6
Why is PM 50W better than GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60W?
- Work area (surface)400 cm² vs 306 cm²+31%
- Work area width (X)200 mm vs 175 mm+14%
- Work area depth (Y)200 mm vs 175 mm+14%
Why is GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60W better than PM 50W?
- Laser output power50 W vs 60 W+20%
- Weight23 kg vs 17.1 kg+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 50 W | 60 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 200 × 200 mm | 175 × 175 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 200 mm | 175 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 200 mm | 175 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 400 cm² | 306 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | 10,000 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.01 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 470 mm | — |
| Depth | 350 mm | — |
| Height | 610 mm | — |
| Weight | 23 kg | 17.1 kg |
