- Processing Talk
- Compare
- SM 100W vs GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60W
Acmer SM 100W vs Monport GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60W
What SM 100W does better (1) and where GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60W wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Power & cutting7.2
4.9Speed4.9
5.1Work area7.1
4.7Safety4.7
5.6Features & ease of use5.6
Why is SM 100W better than GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60W?
- Laser output power100 W vs 60 W+67%
Why is GM Pro Integrated JPT MOPA 60W better than SM 100W?
- Work area (surface)225 cm² vs 306 cm²+36%
- Work area width (X)150 mm vs 175 mm+17%
- Work area depth (Y)150 mm vs 175 mm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | — |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 100 W | 60 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 150 × 150 mm | 175 × 175 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 150 mm | 175 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 150 mm | 175 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 225 cm² | 306 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | 10,000 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.01 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Weight | — | 17.1 kg |
