21 Oct 2026Laser & CNC machines 406Brands 30Comparisons 1,272
PROCESSINGTALKlaser cutters, engravers & CNC routers
TrendingPolar Lite 55W ▲K2 Pro 55W ▲Master 50W ▲S2 Pro 36WPM 60WPRONAX ForgeHydra 9 Gen2 38WSwiftSolis Duo 20W
  1. Processing Talk
  2. Compare
  3. MP 60W vs F2 Ultra MOPA 60W

Cloudray MP 60W vs xTool F2 Ultra MOPA 60W

What MP 60W does better (1) and where F2 Ultra MOPA 60W wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cloudray MP 60W
Cloudray · 2025MP 60W
9.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$6,000
vs
xTool F2 Ultra MOPA 60W
xTool · 2025F2 Ultra MOPA 60W
9.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$4,300
Higher score
7.2Power & cutting7.2
4.7Safety8.9
5.6Features & ease of use7.7

Why is MP 60W better than F2 Ultra MOPA 60W?

  1. Autofocus / auto heightYes · F2 Ultra MOPA 60W: No

Why is F2 Ultra MOPA 60W better than MP 60W?

  1. Enclosed (fully covered)No · MP 60W: Yes
  2. Built-in cameraNo · MP 60W: Yes
  3. Two laser sourcesNo · MP 60W: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Cloudray MP 60WCloudray MP 60W≈ US$6,0009.0
General
Laser sourcesFibre (1064 nm)Fibre (1064 nm), Blue diode (≈455 nm)
Motion systemGalvo (scanning mirrors)Galvo (scanning mirrors)
Two laser sourcesNoYes
MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse)YesYes
Wavelength1,064 nm—
Laser power
Laser output power60 W60 W
Work area
Work area200 × 200 mm—
Work area width (X)200 mm—
Work area depth (Y)200 mm—
Work area (surface)400 cm²—
Conveyor / roll feeder support—Yes
Speed & cutting
Max engraving / travel speed15,000 mm/s—
Safety
Enclosed (fully covered)NoYes
Flame / fire detection—Yes
Features
Built-in cameraNoYes
Autofocus / auto heightYesNo
Rotary attachment supportYes—
Offline engraving (no computer)—Yes
Water coolingYes—
Connectivity & software
ConnectionsUSB—
USBYes—
Compatible softwareLightBurn—
LightBurn compatibleYes—
Size & power
Rated power consumption600 W—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare