6% pricier ≈ US$850
- Work area (surface) 3,200 cm² vs 630 cm²
- Work area width (X) 800 mm vs 300 mm
- Work area depth (Y) 400 mm vs 210 mm
- Enclosed (fully covered)
- Built-in camera
- Processing Talk
- Laser & CNC machines
- Ortur R2 1.3W
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Ortur R2 1.3W
10 diode laser engravers at a similar price that compete with the R2 1.3W — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the R2 1.3W
5% cheaper ≈ US$760
- Laser output power 48 W vs 1.3 W
- Work area (surface) 1,600 cm² vs 630 cm²
- Max engraving / travel speed 400 mm/s vs 333 mm/s
- Enclosed (fully covered)
- Built-in camera
9% cheaper ≈ US$730
- Laser output power 20 W vs 1.3 W
- Weight 14.1 kg vs 11.1 kg
4% cheaper ≈ US$770
- Work area (surface) 1,540 cm² vs 630 cm²
- Autofocus / auto height
- Work area depth (Y) 400 mm vs 210 mm
- Enclosed (fully covered)
- Built-in camera
27% cheaper ≈ US$580
- Laser output power 36 W vs 1.3 W
- Work area (surface) 1,600 cm² vs 630 cm²
- Max engraving / travel speed 400 mm/s vs 333 mm/s
- Enclosed (fully covered)
- Built-in camera
6% pricier ≈ US$850
- Laser output power 21 W vs 1.3 W
- Work area (surface) 1,280 cm² vs 630 cm²
- Max engraving / travel speed 600 mm/s vs 333 mm/s
- Flame / fire detection
- Weight 12.1 kg vs 11.1 kg
6% pricier ≈ US$850
- Laser output power 40 W vs 1.3 W
- Work area (surface) 946 cm² vs 630 cm²
- Max engraving / travel speed 600 mm/s vs 333 mm/s
- Built-in camera
- Flame / fire detection
9% cheaper ≈ US$730
- Laser output power 20 W vs 1.3 W
- Work area (surface) 1,640 cm² vs 630 cm²
- Work area depth (Y) 410 mm vs 210 mm
- Enclosed (fully covered)
- Flame / fire detection
16% cheaper ≈ US$670
- Laser output power 40 W vs 1.3 W
- Work area (surface) 946 cm² vs 630 cm²
- Max engraving / travel speed 600 mm/s vs 333 mm/s
- Enclosed (fully covered)
- Positioning accuracy 0.06 mm vs 0.01 mm