- Processing Talk
- Compare
- R2 1.3W vs R2 20W
Ortur R2 1.3W vs Ortur R2 20W
What R2 1.3W does better (1) and where R2 20W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
R2 1.3WR2 20W
| R2 1.3W | R2 20W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 214 mm | 214 mm | = |
| Width | 470 mm | 470 mm | = |
| Depth | 400 mm | 400 mm | = |
| Weight | 11.1 kg | 14.1 kg | −3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is R2 1.3W better than R2 20W?
- Weight11.1 kg vs 14.1 kg+27%
Why is R2 20W better than R2 1.3W?
- Laser output power1.3 W vs 20 W15.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm), Infrared diode (1064 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm), Infrared diode (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 1.3 W | 20 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 300 × 210 mm | 300 × 210 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 210 mm | 210 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 630 cm² | 630 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 333 mm/s | 333 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.01 mm | 0.01 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | Yes |
| Laser safety class | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | Yes | Yes |
| Tilt / movement sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Exhaust fan | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | Yes | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Phone app control | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 470 mm | 470 mm |
| Depth | 400 mm | 400 mm |
| Height | 214 mm | 214 mm |
| Weight | 11.1 kg | 14.1 kg |
