- Processing Talk
- Compare
- M4 Pro vs R2 1.3W
AtomStack M4 Pro vs Ortur R2 1.3W
What M4 Pro does better (2) and where R2 1.3W wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Why is M4 Pro better than R2 1.3W?
- Autofocus / auto heightYes · R2 1.3W: No
- Weight2.8 kg vs 11.1 kg4×
Why is R2 1.3W better than M4 Pro?
- Work area (surface)100 cm² vs 630 cm²6.3×
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · M4 Pro: Yes
- Air assistNo · M4 Pro: Yes
- Built-in cameraNo · M4 Pro: Yes
- Work area width (X)100 mm vs 300 mm3×
- Work area depth (Y)100 mm vs 210 mm2.1×
- Flame / fire detectionNo · M4 Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm), Infrared diode (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | — | 1.3 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 100 × 100 mm | 300 × 210 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 100 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 100 mm | 210 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 100 cm² | 630 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 333 mm/s |
| Max cutting depth – wood / plywood (one pass) | 5 mm | — |
| Max cutting depth – acrylic | 8 mm | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.03 mm | — |
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.01 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Laser safety class | — | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | No | Yes |
| Tilt / movement sensor | — | Yes |
| Exhaust fan | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Phone app control | Yes | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 470 mm |
| Depth | — | 400 mm |
| Height | — | 214 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 11.1 kg |
