- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Ray7S 40W vs R2 1.3W
Longer Ray7S 40W vs Ortur R2 1.3W
What Ray7S 40W does better (4) and where R2 1.3W wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Ray7S 40W better than R2 1.3W?
- Laser output power40 W vs 1.3 W30.8×
- Work area (surface)946 cm² vs 630 cm²+50%
- Max engraving / travel speed600 mm/s vs 333 mm/s+80%
- Work area depth (Y)310 mm vs 210 mm+48%
Why is R2 1.3W better than Ray7S 40W?
- Built-in cameraNo · Ray7S 40W: Yes
- Flame / fire detectionNo · Ray7S 40W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm), Infrared diode (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 40 W | 1.3 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 305 × 310 mm | 300 × 210 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 305 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 310 mm | 210 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 946 cm² | 630 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 600 mm/s | 333 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.06 mm | — |
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.01 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | Yes |
| Laser safety class | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | No | Yes |
| Tilt / movement sensor | — | Yes |
| Exhaust fan | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | Wi-Fi | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Phone app control | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 470 mm |
| Depth | — | 400 mm |
| Height | — | 214 mm |
| Weight | — | 11.1 kg |
