- Processing Talk
- Compare
- A40 Pro V2 vs R2 1.3W
AtomStack A40 Pro V2 vs Ortur R2 1.3W
What A40 Pro V2 does better (4) and where R2 1.3W wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Work area4.5
6.4Safety9.0
9.4Features & ease of use8.6
Why is A40 Pro V2 better than R2 1.3W?
- Work area (surface)1,540 cm² vs 630 cm²2.4×
- Autofocus / auto heightYes · R2 1.3W: No
- Work area depth (Y)400 mm vs 210 mm+90%
- Work area width (X)385 mm vs 300 mm+28%
Why is R2 1.3W better than A40 Pro V2?
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · A40 Pro V2: Yes
- Built-in cameraNo · A40 Pro V2: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm), Infrared diode (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | — | 1.3 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 385 × 400 mm | 300 × 210 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 385 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 400 mm | 210 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 1,540 cm² | 630 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 333 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.01 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Laser safety class | — | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | Yes | Yes |
| Tilt / movement sensor | — | Yes |
| Exhaust fan | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Phone app control | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 470 mm |
| Depth | — | 400 mm |
| Height | — | 214 mm |
| Weight | — | 11.1 kg |
