Alternatives to OMTech Polar S 55W
10 CO2 laser cutters at a similar price that compete with the Polar S 55W — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Polar S 55W
9% cheaper ≈ US$2,250
- Laser output power 65 W vs 55 W
- Weight 30.4 kg vs 75 kg
- Pass-through slot
- Max engraving / travel speed 600 mm/s vs 1,000 mm/s
- Work area (surface) 1,496 cm² vs 1,830 cm²
87% pricier ≈ US$4,600
- Work area (surface) 5,385 cm² vs 1,830 cm²
- Laser output power 90 W vs 55 W
- Max engraving / travel speed 1,200 mm/s vs 1,000 mm/s
- Built-in camera
- Autofocus / auto height
33% pricier ≈ US$3,300
- Work area (surface) 2,250 cm² vs 1,830 cm²
- Weight 48.5 kg vs 75 kg
- Work area depth (Y) 375 mm vs 305 mm
- Max engraving / travel speed 900 mm/s vs 1,000 mm/s
Same price ≈ US$2,400
- Weight 28 kg vs 75 kg
- Work area (surface) 1,500 cm² vs 1,830 cm²
- Laser output power 50 W vs 55 W
35% cheaper ≈ US$1,600
- Work area (surface) 2,816 cm² vs 1,830 cm²
- Laser output power 65 W vs 55 W
- Pass-through slot
- Max engraving / travel speed 500 mm/s vs 1,000 mm/s
- Built-in camera
22% pricier ≈ US$3,000
- Work area (surface) 3,612 cm² vs 1,830 cm²
- Laser output power 60 W vs 55 W
- Pass-through slot
- Max engraving / travel speed 600 mm/s vs 1,000 mm/s
- Built-in camera
35% cheaper ≈ US$1,600
- Work area (surface) 2,531 cm² vs 1,830 cm²
- Laser output power 65 W vs 55 W
- Weight 30.4 kg vs 75 kg
- Max engraving / travel speed 500 mm/s vs 1,000 mm/s
- Built-in camera
50% pricier ≈ US$3,700
- Max engraving / travel speed 2,000 mm/s vs 1,000 mm/s
- Work area (surface) 2,556 cm² vs 1,830 cm²
- Laser output power 70 W vs 55 W
19% pricier ≈ US$2,900
- Pass-through slot
- Weight 59 kg vs 75 kg
- Max engraving / travel speed 600 mm/s vs 1,000 mm/s
- Work area (surface) 1,500 cm² vs 1,830 cm²