- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Polar S 55W vs X1 Next-Gen
OMTech Polar S 55W vs xTool X1 Next-Gen
What Polar S 55W does better (0) and where X1 Next-Gen wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Safety8.9
Why is Polar S 55W better than X1 Next-Gen?
Polar S 55W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X1 Next-Gen better than Polar S 55W?
X1 Next-Gen has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | CO2 (10.6 µm) | CO2 (10.6 µm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 55 W | — |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 600 × 305 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 600 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 305 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 1,830 cm² | — |
| Pass-through slot | No | — |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 1,000 mm/s | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | Yes |
| Laser safety class | — | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | Yes | Yes |
| Emergency stop button | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | — |
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | — |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Water cooling | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB, Wi-Fi, Ethernet, SD / USB drive | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| USB | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | — |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, RDWorks | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Controller / firmware | Ruida | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 1,087 mm | — |
| Depth | 607 mm | — |
| Height | 356 mm | — |
| Weight | 75 kg | — |
| Input voltage | 110–120 V | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Monport Reno Pro&Vision 65WvsOMTech Polar S 55W
5.66.7
vs
Monport Reno65 65WvsOMTech Polar S 55W
5.86.7
vs
Monport Reno 65WvsOMTech Polar S 55W
5.66.7
vs
OMTech Polar S 55WvsOMTech Pronto U1 155W
6.79.4
vs
OMTech Pronto 35 60WvsOMTech Polar S 55W
6.16.7
vs
OMTech Polar S 55WvsOMTech Pronto U1 105W
6.79.1