- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Beamo Hybrid vs Z3
FLUX Beamo Hybrid vs Wainlux Z3
What Beamo Hybrid does better (5) and where Z3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.2Power & cutting2.9
4.4Work area2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Beamo HybridZ3
| Beamo Hybrid | Z3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 80 mm | 220 mm | −140 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 220 mm | −177 mm |
| Depth | 53 mm | 130 mm | −77 mm |
| Weight | 0.3 kg | 2.4 kg | −2.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Beamo Hybrid better than Z3?
- Work area (surface)460 cm² vs 64 cm²7.2×
- Laser output power5 W vs 4.5 W+11%
- Work area width (X)230 mm vs 80 mm2.9×
- Work area depth (Y)200 mm vs 80 mm2.5×
- Weight0.3 kg vs 2.4 kg8×
Why is Z3 better than Beamo Hybrid?
Z3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | — | No |
| Wavelength | — | 455 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 5 W | 4.5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 230 × 200 mm | 80 × 80 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 230 mm | 80 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 200 mm | 80 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 460 cm² | 64 cm² |
| Work-area extension kit | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 600 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.05 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | — | No |
| Flame / fire detection | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | — | No |
| Built-in camera | — | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | — | No |
| Rotary attachment support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | SD / USB drive |
| SD / TF card | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 43 mm | 220 mm |
| Depth | 53 mm | 130 mm |
| Height | 80 mm | 220 mm |
| Weight | 0.3 kg | 2.4 kg |
