- Processing Talk
- Compare
- MOPA 60W vs F2 Ultra MOPA 60W
OMTech MOPA 60W vs xTool F2 Ultra MOPA 60W
What MOPA 60W does better (0) and where F2 Ultra MOPA 60W wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Power & cutting7.2
2.2Safety8.9
2.2Features & ease of use7.7
Why is MOPA 60W better than F2 Ultra MOPA 60W?
MOPA 60W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is F2 Ultra MOPA 60W better than MOPA 60W?
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · MOPA 60W: Yes
- Built-in cameraNo · MOPA 60W: Yes
- Two laser sourcesNo · MOPA 60W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm), Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | Yes |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | — |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 60 W | 60 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 150 × 150 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 150 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 150 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 225 cm² | — |
| Conveyor / roll feeder support | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | — |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.01 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Laser safety class | Class 4 (open beam) | — |
| Flame / fire detection | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | — |
| USB | Yes | — |
| Compatible software | EZCAD2 | — |
| File formats | AI, BMP, DXF, GIF, JPG, PLT, PNG, TIF | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 555 mm | — |
| Depth | 335 mm | — |
| Height | 720 mm | — |
| Weight | 28 kg | — |
| Rated power consumption | 60 W | — |
