- Processing Talk
- Compare
- MOPA 30W vs MOPA 60W
OMTech MOPA 30W vs OMTech MOPA 60W
What MOPA 30W does better (0) and where MOPA 60W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MOPA 30WMOPA 60W
| MOPA 30W | MOPA 60W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 720 mm | 720 mm | = |
| Width | 555 mm | 555 mm | = |
| Depth | 335 mm | 335 mm | = |
| Weight | 28 kg | 28 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MOPA 30W better than MOPA 60W?
MOPA 30W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is MOPA 60W better than MOPA 30W?
- Laser output power30 W vs 60 W2×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | 1,064 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 30 W | 60 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 150 × 150 mm | 150 × 150 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 225 cm² | 225 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | 10,000 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.01 mm | 0.01 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Laser safety class | Class 4 (open beam) | Class 4 (open beam) |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | USB |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Compatible software | EZCAD2 | EZCAD2 |
| File formats | AI, BMP, DXF, GIF, JPG, PLT, PNG, TIF | AI, BMP, DXF, GIF, JPG, PLT, PNG, TIF |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 555 mm | 555 mm |
| Depth | 335 mm | 335 mm |
| Height | 720 mm | 720 mm |
| Weight | 28 kg | 28 kg |
| Rated power consumption | 60 W | 60 W |
