- Processing Talk
- Compare
- GPro Vision Split MOPA 50W vs Q3 50W
Monport GPro Vision Split MOPA 50W vs OMTech Q3 50W
What GPro Vision Split MOPA 50W does better (1) and where Q3 50W wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Power & cutting9.2
8.2Work area4.6
5.5Features & ease of use3.3
Why is GPro Vision Split MOPA 50W better than Q3 50W?
- Autofocus / auto heightYes · Q3 50W: No
Why is Q3 50W better than GPro Vision Split MOPA 50W?
- Work area (surface)404 cm² vs 875 cm²2.2×
- Work area width (X)201 mm vs 350 mm+74%
- Work area depth (Y)201 mm vs 250 mm+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm), Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | — |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | — |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | — |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 201 × 201 mm | 350 × 250 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 201 mm | 350 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 201 mm | 250 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 404 cm² | 875 cm² |
| Max workpiece height | — | 170 mm |
| Conveyor / roll feeder support | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | — |
| Laser safety class | — | Class 4 (open beam) |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | — |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Laser module option (CNC) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
