- Processing Talk
- Compare
- CL-4x4 vs TTC6050
FoxAlien CL-4x4 vs Two Trees TTC6050
What CL-4x4 does better (4) and where TTC6050 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is CL-4x4 better than TTC6050?
- Work area (surface)14,884 cm² vs 3,000 cm²5×
- Closed-loop motors / servosYes · TTC6050: No
- Work area depth (Y)1,220 mm vs 500 mm2.4×
- Work area width (X)1,220 mm vs 600 mm2×
Why is TTC6050 better than CL-4x4?
- Spindle power400 W vs 500 W+25%
- Laser module option (CNC)No · CL-4x4: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Frame material | — | Aluminium |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 1220 × 1220 mm | 600 × 500 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 1,220 mm | 600 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 1,220 mm | 500 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 14,884 cm² | 3,000 cm² |
| Z travel | 100 mm | 100 mm |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 83 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Closed-loop motors / servos | Yes | No |
| Linear rails | Yes | Yes |
| Ball screws | Yes | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Emergency stop button | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Rotary attachment support | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen / control panel | Yes | Yes |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | Yes | Yes |
| Laser module option (CNC) | No | Yes |
| Automatic tool changer | No | No |
| Tool length / Z probe | No | No |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | USB |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Compatible software | — | Easel, Fusion 360, Vectric VCarve |
| Controller / firmware | — | GRBL |
| File formats | — | NC, G-code |
| CNC milling | ||
| Spindle power | 400 W | 500 W |
| Max spindle speed | — | 12,000 rpm |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 811 mm |
| Depth | — | 769 mm |
| Height | — | 530 mm |
| Weight | — | 35.9 kg |
