- Processing Talk
- Compare
- MP 100W vs GT Split MOPA 200W
Cloudray MP 100W vs Monport GT Split MOPA 200W
What MP 100W does better (4) and where GT Split MOPA 200W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Power & cutting9.6
8.6Speed4.9
7.8Work area5.1
4.7Safety4.7
5.6Features & ease of use5.6
Why is MP 100W better than GT Split MOPA 200W?
- Work area (surface)400 cm² vs 225 cm²+78%
- Max engraving / travel speed15,000 mm/s vs 10,000 mm/s+50%
- Work area width (X)200 mm vs 150 mm+33%
- Work area depth (Y)200 mm vs 150 mm+33%
Why is GT Split MOPA 200W better than MP 100W?
- Laser output power100 W vs 200 W2×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | 1,064 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 100 W | 200 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 200 × 200 mm | 150 × 150 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 200 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 200 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 400 cm² | 225 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 15,000 mm/s | 10,000 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.01 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Water cooling | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | USB |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Weight | — | 34 kg |
| Rated power consumption | 600 W | — |
