- Processing Talk
- Compare
- MP 100W vs F2 Ultra MOPA 60W
Cloudray MP 100W vs xTool F2 Ultra MOPA 60W
What MP 100W does better (2) and where F2 Ultra MOPA 60W wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Power & cutting7.2
4.7Safety8.9
5.6Features & ease of use7.7
Why is MP 100W better than F2 Ultra MOPA 60W?
- Laser output power100 W vs 60 W+67%
- Autofocus / auto heightYes · F2 Ultra MOPA 60W: No
Why is F2 Ultra MOPA 60W better than MP 100W?
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · MP 100W: Yes
- Built-in cameraNo · MP 100W: Yes
- Two laser sourcesNo · MP 100W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm), Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | Yes |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | — |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 100 W | 60 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 200 × 200 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 200 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 200 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 400 cm² | — |
| Conveyor / roll feeder support | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 15,000 mm/s | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Flame / fire detection | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Water cooling | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | — |
| USB | Yes | — |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Rated power consumption | 600 W | — |
