- Processing Talk
- Compare
- MP 100W vs G3 50W
Cloudray MP 100W vs Gweike G3 50W
What MP 100W does better (4) and where G3 50W wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is MP 100W better than G3 50W?
- Laser output power100 W vs 50 W2×
- Work area (surface)400 cm² vs 289 cm²+38%
- Work area width (X)200 mm vs 170 mm+18%
- Work area depth (Y)200 mm vs 170 mm+18%
Why is G3 50W better than MP 100W?
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · MP 100W: Yes
- Built-in cameraNo · MP 100W: Yes
- Two laser sourcesNo · MP 100W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm), Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | Yes |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | — |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | 1,064 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 100 W | 50 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 200 × 200 mm | 170 × 170 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 200 mm | 170 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 200 mm | 170 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 400 cm² | 289 cm² |
| Conveyor / roll feeder support | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 15,000 mm/s | 15,000 mm/s |
| Max cutting depth – wood / plywood (one pass) | — | 23 mm |
| Max cutting depth – acrylic | — | 20 mm |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | — | 0.1 mm |
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.003 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Water cooling | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | USB, Wi-Fi |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 526 mm |
| Depth | — | 220 mm |
| Height | — | 330 mm |
| Weight | — | 12.2 kg |
| Rated power consumption | 600 W | — |
| Input voltage | — | 110–240 V |
