- Processing Talk
- Compare
- X70 Max vs GM 200W
AtomStack X70 Max vs Cloudray GM 200W
What X70 Max does better (3) and where GM 200W wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is X70 Max better than GM 200W?
- Work area (surface)6,800 cm² vs 121 cm²56.2×
- Work area width (X)800 mm vs 110 mm7.3×
- Work area depth (Y)850 mm vs 110 mm7.7×
Why is GM 200W better than X70 Max?
- Laser output power77 W vs 200 W2.6×
- Max engraving / travel speed400 mm/s vs 15,000 mm/s37.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | — | Yes |
| Wavelength | — | 1,064 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 77 W | 200 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 800 × 850 mm | 110 × 110 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 800 mm | 110 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 850 mm | 110 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 6,800 cm² | 121 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 400 mm/s | 15,000 mm/s |
| Max cutting depth – acrylic | 25 mm | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.18 mm | — |
| Positioning accuracy | 0.01 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | — |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen / control panel | Yes | — |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | Yes | — |
| Water cooling | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, LaserGRBL, AtomStack Studio | LightBurn, EZCAD3 |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 1,056 mm | — |
| Depth | 1,168 mm | — |
| Height | 230 mm | — |
| Rated power consumption | 360 W | 615 W |
| Input voltage | 100–240 V | — |
