- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Swift vs TTS-55 Pro
AtomStack Swift vs Two Trees TTS-55 Pro
What Swift does better (2) and where TTS-55 Pro wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Power & cutting3.8
4.8Work area4.8
3.2Safety3.2
5.7Features & ease of use6.4
Why is Swift better than TTS-55 Pro?
- Laser output power7 W vs 5.5 W+27%
- Weight2.8 kg vs 3.2 kg+14%
Why is TTS-55 Pro better than Swift?
TTS-55 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 7 W | 5.5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 300 × 300 mm | 300 × 300 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 900 cm² | 900 cm² |
| Work-area extension kit | Yes | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 500 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | — | 0.08 mm |
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.08 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | Wi-Fi, SD / USB drive |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| SD / TF card | — | Yes |
| Phone app control | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio | LightBurn, LaserGRBL |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 570 mm |
| Depth | — | 510 mm |
| Height | — | 150 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 3.2 kg |
