- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Swift vs K70 Max
AtomStack Swift vs Ikier K70 Max
What Swift does better (0) and where K70 Max wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Why is Swift better than K70 Max?
Swift has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is K70 Max better than Swift?
- Laser output power7 W vs 77 W11×
- Work area (surface)900 cm² vs 6,800 cm²7.6×
- Autofocus / auto heightNo · Swift: Yes
- Work area width (X)300 mm vs 850 mm2.8×
- Work area depth (Y)300 mm vs 800 mm2.7×
- Flame / fire detectionNo · Swift: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Wavelength | — | 455 nm |
| Frame material | — | Steel |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 7 W | 77 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 300 × 300 mm | 850 × 800 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 300 mm | 850 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 300 mm | 800 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 900 cm² | 6,800 cm² |
| Work-area extension kit | Yes | — |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 600 mm/s |
| Max cutting depth – acrylic | — | 25 mm |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | — | 0.2 mm |
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.01 mm |
| Linear rails | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | Yes |
| Laser shield / filter cover | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB, Wi-Fi |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| USB | — | Yes |
| SD / TF card | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio | LightBurn, LaserGRBL |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| File formats | — | PNG, JPG, BMP, GIF, DXF, SVG |
| Size & power | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | — |
| Rated power consumption | — | 360 W |
| Input voltage | — | 100–240 V |
