- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Swift vs C1 Mini 3W
AtomStack Swift vs Sculpfun C1 Mini 3W
What Swift does better (5) and where C1 Mini 3W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Power & cutting2.5
4.8Work area3.5
3.2Safety3.2
5.7Features & ease of use2.7
Why is Swift better than C1 Mini 3W?
- Work area (surface)900 cm² vs 195 cm²4.6×
- Laser output power7 W vs 3 W2.3×
- Air assistYes · C1 Mini 3W: No
- Work area depth (Y)300 mm vs 130 mm2.3×
- Work area width (X)300 mm vs 150 mm2×
Why is C1 Mini 3W better than Swift?
- Weight2.8 kg vs 1.1 kg2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 7 W | 3 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 300 × 300 mm | 150 × 130 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 300 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 300 mm | 130 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 900 cm² | 195 cm² |
| Work-area extension kit | Yes | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | — | 0.04 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio | LightBurn, LaserGRBL |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 290 mm |
| Depth | — | 250 mm |
| Height | — | 140 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 1.1 kg |
