- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Swift Mini vs C1 Mini 3W
AtomStack Swift Mini vs Sculpfun C1 Mini 3W
What Swift Mini does better (2) and where C1 Mini 3W wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Power & cutting2.5
3.6Work area3.5
3.2Safety3.2
3.4Features & ease of use2.7
Why is Swift Mini better than C1 Mini 3W?
- Laser output power3.5 W vs 3 W+17%
- Work area depth (Y)145 mm vs 130 mm+12%
Why is C1 Mini 3W better than Swift Mini?
- Weight2.6 kg vs 1.1 kg2.4×
- Work area width (X)135 mm vs 150 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 3.5 W | 3 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 135 × 145 mm | 150 × 130 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 135 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 145 mm | 130 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 196 cm² | 195 cm² |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | — | 0.04 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio | LightBurn, LaserGRBL |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 290 mm |
| Depth | — | 250 mm |
| Height | — | 140 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 1.1 kg |
