- Processing Talk
- Compare
- T150 3W vs Swift Mini
Algolaser T150 3W vs AtomStack Swift Mini
What T150 3W does better (2) and where Swift Mini wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Power & cutting2.7
4.9Safety3.2
9.1Features & ease of use3.4
Why is T150 3W better than Swift Mini?
- Air assistYes · Swift Mini: No
- Built-in cameraYes · Swift Mini: No
Why is Swift Mini better than T150 3W?
- Laser output power3 W vs 3.5 W+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 3 W | 3.5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | — | 135 × 145 mm |
| Work area width (X) | — | 135 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | — | 145 mm |
| Work area (surface) | — | 196 cm² |
| Work-area extension kit | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Built-in fume filter / purifier | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | No |
| Built-in camera | Yes | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | Wi-Fi | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Weight | — | 2.6 kg |
