- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Swift Mini vs Kortek 2.5W
AtomStack Swift Mini vs Genmitsu Kortek 2.5W
What Swift Mini does better (1) and where Kortek 2.5W wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Power & cutting2.3
3.6Work area4.2
3.2Safety8.3
3.4Features & ease of use7.4
Why is Swift Mini better than Kortek 2.5W?
- Laser output power3.5 W vs 2.5 W+40%
Why is Kortek 2.5W better than Swift Mini?
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · Swift Mini: Yes
- Work area (surface)196 cm² vs 300 cm²+53%
- Air assistNo · Swift Mini: Yes
- Work area depth (Y)145 mm vs 200 mm+38%
- Work area width (X)135 mm vs 150 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm), Infrared diode (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Wavelength | — | 455 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 3.5 W | 2.5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 135 × 145 mm | 150 × 200 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 135 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 145 mm | 200 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 196 cm² | 300 cm² |
| Max workpiece height | — | 60 mm |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 117 mm/s |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Laser safety class | — | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Laser shield / filter cover | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB, Wi-Fi |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Phone app control | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Weight | 2.6 kg | — |
| Rated power consumption | — | 60 W |
