- Processing Talk
- Compare
- S2 Pro 36W vs Swift
Acmer S2 Pro 36W vs AtomStack Swift
What S2 Pro 36W does better (4) and where Swift wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Power & cutting4.4
7.7Work area4.8
3.2Safety3.2
5.7Features & ease of use5.7
Why is S2 Pro 36W better than Swift?
- Laser output power36 W vs 7 W5.1×
- Work area (surface)1,600 cm² vs 900 cm²+78%
- Work area width (X)400 mm vs 300 mm+33%
- Work area depth (Y)400 mm vs 300 mm+33%
Why is Swift better than S2 Pro 36W?
Swift has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 36 W | 7 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 400 × 400 mm | 300 × 300 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 400 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 400 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 1,600 cm² | 900 cm² |
| Work-area extension kit | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 400 mm/s | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.1 mm | — |
| Linear rails | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Weight | — | 2.8 kg |
