- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Swift vs Kortek 5W
AtomStack Swift vs Genmitsu Kortek 5W
What Swift does better (4) and where Kortek 5W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Swift better than Kortek 5W?
- Work area (surface)900 cm² vs 300 cm²3×
- Laser output power7 W vs 5 W+40%
- Work area width (X)300 mm vs 150 mm2×
- Work area depth (Y)300 mm vs 200 mm+50%
Why is Kortek 5W better than Swift?
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · Swift: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm), Infrared diode (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Wavelength | — | 455 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 7 W | 5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 300 × 300 mm | 150 × 200 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 300 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 300 mm | 200 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 900 cm² | 300 cm² |
| Max workpiece height | — | 60 mm |
| Work-area extension kit | Yes | — |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 117 mm/s |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Laser safety class | — | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Laser shield / filter cover | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB, Wi-Fi |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Phone app control | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | — |
| Rated power consumption | — | 60 W |
