- Processing Talk
- Compare
- X1 40W vs Nano Duo
Aliencell X1 40W vs Longer Nano Duo
What X1 40W does better (7) and where Nano Duo wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is X1 40W better than Nano Duo?
- Work area (surface)2,910 cm² vs 900 cm²3.2×
- Enclosed (fully covered)Yes · Nano Duo: No
- Air assistYes · Nano Duo: No
- Built-in cameraYes · Nano Duo: No
- Work area width (X)610 mm vs 300 mm2×
- Flame / fire detectionYes · Nano Duo: No
- Work area depth (Y)477 mm vs 300 mm+59%
Why is Nano Duo better than X1 40W?
Nano Duo has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | — | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 40 W | — |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 610 × 477 mm | 300 × 300 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 610 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 477 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 2,910 cm² | 900 cm² |
| Conveyor / roll feeder support | — | Yes |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.1 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | No |
| Laser safety class | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) | — |
| Flame / fire detection | Yes | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | No |
| Built-in camera | Yes | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen / control panel | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB, Wi-Fi, Ethernet | SD / USB drive |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| USB | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | — |
| SD / TF card | — | Yes |
| Phone app control | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| File formats | SVG, DXF, JPG, PNG, BMP | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 903 mm | — |
| Depth | 787 mm | — |
| Height | 213 mm | — |
| Weight | 35 kg | — |
| Rated power consumption | 350 W | — |
