- Processing Talk
- Compare
- T150 3W vs Falcon2 Pro 60W
Algolaser T150 3W vs Creality Falcon2 Pro 60W
What T150 3W does better (0) and where Falcon2 Pro 60W wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Power & cutting9.6
4.8Safety9.8
Why is T150 3W better than Falcon2 Pro 60W?
T150 3W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Falcon2 Pro 60W better than T150 3W?
- Laser output power3 W vs 60 W20×
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · T150 3W: Yes
- Flame / fire detectionNo · T150 3W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | — |
| Wavelength | — | 455 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 3 W | 60 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | — | 400 × 415 mm |
| Work area width (X) | — | 400 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | — | 415 mm |
| Work area (surface) | — | 1,660 cm² |
| Work-area extension kit | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Laser safety class | — | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | No | Yes |
| Built-in fume filter / purifier | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | — |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | Wi-Fi | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn, LaserGRBL |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 664 mm |
| Depth | — | 570 mm |
| Height | — | 328 mm |
| Weight | — | 18 kg |
| Input voltage | — | 100–240 V |
