- Processing Talk
- Compare
- S2 Pro 36W vs Swift Mini
Acmer S2 Pro 36W vs AtomStack Swift Mini
What S2 Pro 36W does better (5) and where Swift Mini wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Power & cutting2.7
7.8Work area3.7
3.2Safety3.2
5.7Features & ease of use3.4
Why is S2 Pro 36W better than Swift Mini?
- Laser output power36 W vs 3.5 W10.3×
- Work area (surface)1,600 cm² vs 196 cm²8.2×
- Air assistYes · Swift Mini: No
- Work area width (X)400 mm vs 135 mm3×
- Work area depth (Y)400 mm vs 145 mm2.8×
Why is Swift Mini better than S2 Pro 36W?
Swift Mini has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 36 W | 3.5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 400 × 400 mm | 135 × 145 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 400 mm | 135 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 400 mm | 145 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 1,600 cm² | 196 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 400 mm/s | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.1 mm | — |
| Linear rails | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Weight | — | 2.6 kg |
