- Processing Talk
- Compare
- S2 12W vs Swift
Acmer S2 12W vs AtomStack Swift
What S2 12W does better (1) and where Swift wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is S2 12W better than Swift?
- Laser output power12 W vs 7 W+71%
Why is Swift better than S2 12W?
Swift has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 12 W | 7 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 300 × 300 mm | 300 × 300 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 900 cm² | 900 cm² |
| Work-area extension kit | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 167 mm/s | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.06 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | — |
| Depth | 500 mm | — |
| Height | 195 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 2.8 kg |
