- Processing Talk
- Compare
- S1 2.5W vs C1 Mini 6W
Acmer S1 2.5W vs Sculpfun C1 Mini 6W
What S1 2.5W does better (0) and where C1 Mini 6W wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Power & cutting4.1
9.4Precision9.4
2.9Work area3.5
3.2Safety3.2
2.4Features & ease of use2.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
S1 2.5WC1 Mini 6W
| S1 2.5W | C1 Mini 6W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162 mm | 140 mm | +22 mm |
| Width | 250 mm | 290 mm | −40 mm |
| Depth | 250 mm | 250 mm | = |
| Weight | 1.5 kg | 1.1 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S1 2.5W better than C1 Mini 6W?
S1 2.5W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is C1 Mini 6W better than S1 2.5W?
- Laser output power2.5 W vs 6 W2.4×
- Work area (surface)169 cm² vs 195 cm²+15%
- Weight1.5 kg vs 1.1 kg+36%
- Work area width (X)130 mm vs 150 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 2.5 W | 6 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 130 × 130 mm | 150 × 130 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 130 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 130 mm | 130 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 169 cm² | 195 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 167 mm/s | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.04 mm | 0.04 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | — | LightBurn, LaserGRBL |
| LightBurn compatible | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 250 mm | 290 mm |
| Depth | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| Height | 162 mm | 140 mm |
| Weight | 1.5 kg | 1.1 kg |
