- Processing Talk
- Compare
- S1 2.5W vs S1 3.5W
Acmer S1 2.5W vs Acmer S1 3.5W
What S1 2.5W does better (0) and where S1 3.5W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
S1 2.5WS1 3.5W
| S1 2.5W | S1 3.5W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162 mm | 162 mm | = |
| Width | 250 mm | 250 mm | = |
| Depth | 250 mm | 250 mm | = |
| Weight | 1.5 kg | 1.5 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S1 2.5W better than S1 3.5W?
S1 2.5W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is S1 3.5W better than S1 2.5W?
- Laser output power2.5 W vs 3.5 W+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 2.5 W | 3.5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 130 × 130 mm | 130 × 130 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 130 mm | 130 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 130 mm | 130 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 169 cm² | 169 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 167 mm/s | 167 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.04 mm | 0.04 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| Depth | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| Height | 162 mm | 162 mm |
| Weight | 1.5 kg | 1.5 kg |
