- Processing Talk
- Compare
- PM 50W vs SM 50W
Acmer PM 50W vs Acmer SM 50W
What PM 50W does better (3) and where SM 50W wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is PM 50W better than SM 50W?
- Work area (surface)400 cm² vs 225 cm²+78%
- Work area width (X)200 mm vs 150 mm+33%
- Work area depth (Y)200 mm vs 150 mm+33%
Why is SM 50W better than PM 50W?
SM 50W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | Yes |
| Wavelength | — | 1,064 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 200 × 200 mm | 150 × 150 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 200 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 200 mm | 150 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 400 cm² | 225 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | 10,000 mm/s |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 470 mm | — |
| Depth | 350 mm | — |
| Height | 610 mm | — |
| Weight | 23 kg | — |
