- Processing Talk
- Compare
- K1 2.5W vs TS1 Mini
Acmer K1 2.5W vs Two Trees TS1 Mini
What K1 2.5W does better (3) and where TS1 Mini wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
K1 2.5WTS1 Mini
| K1 2.5W | TS1 Mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 190 mm | 167 mm | +23 mm |
| Width | 286 mm | 157 mm | +129 mm |
| Depth | 273 mm | 157 mm | +116 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 1 kg | +1.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K1 2.5W better than TS1 Mini?
- Max engraving / travel speed167 mm/s vs 50 mm/s3.3×
- Enclosed (fully covered)Yes · TS1 Mini: No
- Positioning accuracy0.04 mm vs 0.05 mm+25%
Why is TS1 Mini better than K1 2.5W?
- Weight2.4 kg vs 1 kg2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 2.5 W | — |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 150 × 150 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 150 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 150 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 225 cm² | — |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 167 mm/s | 50 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.04 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | LightBurn | LightBurn, LaserGRBL |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| File formats | — | NC, G-code |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 286 mm | 157 mm |
| Depth | 273 mm | 157 mm |
| Height | 190 mm | 167 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 1 kg |
| Input voltage | — | 100–240 V |
