- Processing Talk
- Compare
- K1 2.5W vs Ray5 miniS 3.5W
Acmer K1 2.5W vs Longer Ray5 miniS 3.5W
What K1 2.5W does better (3) and where Ray5 miniS 3.5W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Power & cutting2.7
3.9Work area3.2
9.6Safety7.9
2.9Features & ease of use3.7
Why is K1 2.5W better than Ray5 miniS 3.5W?
- Work area (surface)225 cm² vs 182 cm²+24%
- Work area width (X)150 mm vs 130 mm+15%
- Work area depth (Y)150 mm vs 140 mm+7%
Why is Ray5 miniS 3.5W better than K1 2.5W?
- Laser output power2.5 W vs 3.5 W+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 2.5 W | 3.5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 150 × 150 mm | 130 × 140 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 150 mm | 130 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 150 mm | 140 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 225 cm² | 182 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 167 mm/s | — |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.04 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | Yes |
| Laser safety class | — | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Emergency stop button | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | USB, Wi-Fi |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Phone app control | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 286 mm | — |
| Depth | 273 mm | — |
| Height | 190 mm | — |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | — |
