- Processing Talk
- Compare
- R2 10W vs K8 Mini 10W
Ortur R2 10W vs Wainlux K8 Mini 10W
What R2 10W does better (5) and where K8 Mini 10W wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Power & cutting4.8
7.6Precision6.2
4.5Work area2.9
9.0Safety9.6
8.6Features & ease of use5.2
Why is R2 10W better than K8 Mini 10W?
- Work area (surface)630 cm² vs 169 cm²3.7×
- Air assistYes · K8 Mini 10W: No
- Work area width (X)300 mm vs 130 mm2.3×
- Flame / fire detectionYes · K8 Mini 10W: No
- Work area depth (Y)210 mm vs 130 mm+62%
Why is K8 Mini 10W better than R2 10W?
K8 Mini 10W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm), Infrared diode (1064 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 300 × 210 mm | 130 × 130 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 300 mm | 130 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 210 mm | 130 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 630 cm² | 169 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 333 mm/s | — |
| Max cutting depth – wood / plywood (one pass) | — | 8 mm |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | — | 0.08 mm |
| Positioning accuracy | 0.01 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | Yes |
| Laser safety class | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) | — |
| Flame / fire detection | Yes | No |
| Tilt / movement sensor | Yes | — |
| Exhaust fan | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | No |
| Built-in camera | Yes | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Phone app control | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 470 mm | — |
| Depth | 400 mm | — |
| Height | 214 mm | — |
| Weight | 12.4 kg | — |
