- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Pro FLUX Flying 100W vs Hydra 9 Gen2 38W
OMTech Pro FLUX Flying 100W vs OneLaser Hydra 9 Gen2 38W
What Pro FLUX Flying 100W does better (1) and where Hydra 9 Gen2 38W wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Power & cutting2.4
4.7Safety4.7
7.8Features & ease of use6.1
Why is Pro FLUX Flying 100W better than Hydra 9 Gen2 38W?
- Laser output power100 W vs 38 W2.6×
Why is Hydra 9 Gen2 38W better than Pro FLUX Flying 100W?
Hydra 9 Gen2 38W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | CO2 (10.6 µm) | CO2 (10.6 µm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 100 W | 38 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 1000 × 600 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 1,000 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 600 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 6,000 cm² | — |
| Max workpiece height | 201 mm | — |
| Pass-through slot | No | — |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.01 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | Yes |
| Exhaust fan | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | — |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen / control panel | Yes | — |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Water cooling | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB, Ethernet | — |
| Wi-Fi | No | — |
| USB | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 1,811 mm | — |
| Depth | 1,290 mm | — |
| Height | 1,031 mm | — |
| Input voltage | 110–120 V | — |
