- Processing Talk
- Compare
- MOPA 60W vs Split 50W
OMTech MOPA 60W vs OMTech Split 50W
What MOPA 60W does better (3) and where Split 50W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is MOPA 60W better than Split 50W?
- Laser output power60 W vs 50 W+20%
- Max engraving / travel speed10,000 mm/s vs 7,000 mm/s+43%
- Weight28 kg vs 35.4 kg+26%
Why is Split 50W better than MOPA 60W?
- Autofocus / auto heightNo · MOPA 60W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Fibre (1064 nm) | Fibre (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| MOPA fibre source (adjustable pulse) | Yes | — |
| Wavelength | 1,064 nm | 1,064 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 60 W | 50 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 150 × 150 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 150 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 150 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 225 cm² | — |
| Pass-through slot | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 10,000 mm/s | 7,000 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | 0.01 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Laser safety class | Class 4 (open beam) | — |
| Emergency stop button | — | Yes |
| Exhaust fan | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | — | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | — | Yes |
| Water cooling | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | USB |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Compatible software | EZCAD2 | EZCAD2 |
| File formats | AI, BMP, DXF, GIF, JPG, PLT, PNG, TIF | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 555 mm | — |
| Depth | 335 mm | — |
| Height | 720 mm | — |
| Weight | 28 kg | 35.4 kg |
| Rated power consumption | 60 W | — |
