- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Ray7S 15W vs R1 1.3W
Longer Ray7S 15W vs Ortur R1 1.3W
What Ray7S 15W does better (8) and where R1 1.3W wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is Ray7S 15W better than R1 1.3W?
- Laser output power15 W vs 1.3 W11.5×
- Work area (surface)946 cm² vs 100 cm²9.5×
- Max engraving / travel speed600 mm/s vs 83 mm/s7.2×
- Laser spot size0.06 mm vs 0.11 mm+83%
- Air assistYes · R1 1.3W: No
- Work area width (X)305 mm vs 100 mm3×
- Work area depth (Y)310 mm vs 100 mm3.1×
- Wi-FiYes · R1 1.3W: No
Why is R1 1.3W better than Ray7S 15W?
R1 1.3W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm), Infrared diode (1064 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Wavelength | — | 450 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 15 W | 1.3 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 305 × 310 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 305 mm | 100 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 310 mm | 100 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 946 cm² | 100 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 600 mm/s | 83 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.06 mm | 0.11 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | Yes |
| Laser safety class | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Tilt / movement sensor | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | No |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | Wi-Fi | USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Phone app control | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 272 mm |
| Depth | — | 250 mm |
| Height | — | 140 mm |
| Weight | — | 2.4 kg |
