- Processing Talk
- Compare
- LP2 vs SF-A9 40W
LaserPecker LP2 vs Sculpfun SF-A9 40W
What LP2 does better (0) and where SF-A9 40W wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Why is LP2 better than SF-A9 40W?
LP2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is SF-A9 40W better than LP2?
- Laser output power5 W vs 40 W8×
- Work area (surface)100 cm² vs 1,600 cm²16×
- Air assistNo · LP2: Yes
- Work area width (X)100 mm vs 400 mm4×
- Work area depth (Y)100 mm vs 400 mm4×
- Flame / fire detectionNo · LP2: Yes
- Wi-FiNo · LP2: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Wavelength | 450 nm | 450 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 5 W | 40 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 100 × 100 mm | 400 × 400 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 100 mm | 400 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 100 mm | 400 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 100 cm² | 1,600 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 600 mm/s | 600 mm/s |
| Max cutting depth – wood / plywood (one pass) | — | 20 mm |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | — | 0.1 mm |
| Linear rails | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Flame / fire detection | No | Yes |
| Emergency stop button | — | Yes |
| Tilt / movement sensor | — | Yes |
| Laser shield / filter cover | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | No | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | Bluetooth | USB, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| USB | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Phone app control | Yes | — |
| Compatible software | LaserPecker App | LightBurn, LaserGRBL |
| LightBurn compatible | — | Yes |
| File formats | JPG, SVG, PNG, BMP, G-code, DXF | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 606 mm |
| Depth | — | 665 mm |
| Height | — | 110 mm |
| Weight | — | 6.2 kg |
