- Processing Talk
- Compare
- XE-Ultra Core vs PROVerXL 6050 Plus
FoxAlien XE-Ultra Core vs Genmitsu PROVerXL 6050 Plus
What XE-Ultra Core does better (5) and where PROVerXL 6050 Plus wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Speed7.0
8.5Precision5.2
8.1Work area6.0
Why is XE-Ultra Core better than PROVerXL 6050 Plus?
- Work area (surface)1,936 cm² vs 1,200 cm²+61%
- Tool length / Z probeYes · PROVerXL 6050 Plus: No
- Z travel120 mm vs 110 mm+9%
- Work area depth (Y)440 mm vs 300 mm+47%
- Work area width (X)440 mm vs 400 mm+10%
Why is PROVerXL 6050 Plus better than XE-Ultra Core?
PROVerXL 6050 Plus has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 440 × 440 mm | 400 × 300 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 440 mm | 400 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 440 mm | 300 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 1,936 cm² | 1,200 cm² |
| Z travel | 120 mm | 110 mm |
| Work-area extension kit | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 83 mm/s | 83 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.1 mm |
| Closed-loop motors / servos | Yes | Yes |
| Linear rails | Yes | Yes |
| Ball screws | Yes | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Laser module option (CNC) | — | No |
| Automatic tool changer | — | No |
| Tool length / Z probe | Yes | No |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Compatible software | — | Candle, UGS |
| Controller / firmware | — | GRBL |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 776 mm |
| Depth | — | 641 mm |
| Height | — | 580 mm |
Related comparisons
vs
Makera Z1vsFoxAlien XE-Ultra Core
8.29.2
vs
Genmitsu PRONAX SparkvsFoxAlien XE-Ultra Core
9.49.2
vs
FoxAlien Masuter Pro MaxvsFoxAlien XE-Ultra Core
vs
Carbide 3D Shapeoko 4vsGenmitsu PROVerXL 6050 Plus
vs
Genmitsu PROVerXL 6050 PlusvsFoxAlien XE-Pro
5.86.5
vs
Genmitsu PROVerXL 6050 PlusvsFoxAlien Vasto V1
5.86.7