- Processing Talk
- Compare
- CL-4x4 vs TTC-H40
FoxAlien CL-4x4 vs Two Trees TTC-H40
What CL-4x4 does better (4) and where TTC-H40 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is CL-4x4 better than TTC-H40?
- Work area (surface)14,884 cm² vs 10,000 cm²+49%
- Closed-loop motors / servosYes · TTC-H40: No
- Work area width (X)1,220 mm vs 1,000 mm+22%
- Work area depth (Y)1,220 mm vs 1,000 mm+22%
Why is TTC-H40 better than CL-4x4?
- Spindle power400 W vs 3,000 W7.5×
- Laser module option (CNC)No · CL-4x4: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Frame material | — | Aluminium |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 1220 × 1220 mm | 1000 × 1000 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 1,220 mm | 1,000 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 1,220 mm | 1,000 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 14,884 cm² | 10,000 cm² |
| Z travel | 100 mm | 100 mm |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 30 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Positioning accuracy | — | 0.05 mm |
| Closed-loop motors / servos | Yes | No |
| Linear rails | Yes | Yes |
| Ball screws | Yes | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Emergency stop button | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touchscreen / control panel | Yes | Yes |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | Yes | Yes |
| Laser module option (CNC) | No | Yes |
| Automatic tool changer | No | No |
| Tool length / Z probe | No | No |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | USB, Wi-Fi, SD / USB drive |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD / TF card | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | — | Easel, Fusion 360, Vectric VCarve |
| Controller / firmware | — | GRBL |
| CNC milling | ||
| Spindle power | 400 W | 3,000 W |
| Max spindle speed | — | 30,000 rpm |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 1,292 mm |
| Depth | — | 1,290 mm |
| Height | — | 404 mm |
| Weight | — | 38.3 kg |
