- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Beamo Hybrid vs LP2
FLUX Beamo Hybrid vs LaserPecker LP2
What Beamo Hybrid does better (3) and where LP2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.2Power & cutting3.2
4.4Work area2.3
Why is Beamo Hybrid better than LP2?
- Work area (surface)460 cm² vs 100 cm²4.6×
- Work area width (X)230 mm vs 100 mm2.3×
- Work area depth (Y)200 mm vs 100 mm2×
Why is LP2 better than Beamo Hybrid?
LP2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | — | No |
| Wavelength | — | 450 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 5 W | 5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 230 × 200 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 230 mm | 100 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 200 mm | 100 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 460 cm² | 100 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 600 mm/s |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | — | No |
| Flame / fire detection | — | No |
| Laser shield / filter cover | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | — | No |
| Built-in camera | — | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | — | No |
| Rotary attachment support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | Bluetooth |
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Phone app control | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | — | LaserPecker App |
| File formats | — | JPG, SVG, PNG, BMP, G-code, DXF |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 43 mm | — |
| Depth | 53 mm | — |
| Height | 80 mm | — |
| Weight | 0.3 kg | — |
