- Processing Talk
- Compare
- TR 10W vs F2 Ultra 5W
Cloudray TR 10W vs xTool F2 Ultra 5W
What TR 10W does better (1) and where F2 Ultra 5W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Power & cutting3.2
7.1Features & ease of use9.6
Why is TR 10W better than F2 Ultra 5W?
- Laser output power10 W vs 5 W2×
Why is F2 Ultra 5W better than TR 10W?
- Built-in cameraNo · TR 10W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | UV (355 nm) | UV (355 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Wavelength | 355 nm | — |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 10 W | 5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 50 × 50 mm | — |
| Work area width (X) | 50 mm | — |
| Work area depth (Y) | 50 mm | — |
| Work area (surface) | 25 cm² | — |
| Conveyor / roll feeder support | — | Yes |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 15,000 mm/s | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.1 mm | — |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | — |
| Emergency stop button | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | Yes | — |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Water cooling | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | — |
| USB | Yes | — |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 350 mm | — |
| Depth | 636 mm | — |
| Height | 638 mm | — |
| Rated power consumption | 675 W | — |
