- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Planar 10W vs TR 5W
Cloudray Planar 10W vs Cloudray TR 5W
What Planar 10W does better (4) and where TR 5W wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Power & cutting3.2
6.6Speed6.6
2.3Precision3.3
8.8Work area2.8
5.7Safety8.3
3.2Features & ease of use7.1
Why is Planar 10W better than TR 5W?
- Work area (surface)400 cm² vs 25 cm²16×
- Laser output power10 W vs 5 W2×
- Work area width (X)200 mm vs 50 mm4×
- Work area depth (Y)200 mm vs 50 mm4×
Why is TR 5W better than Planar 10W?
- Laser spot size0.15 mm vs 0.1 mm+50%
- Autofocus / auto heightNo · Planar 10W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | UV (355 nm) | UV (355 nm) |
| Motion system | Galvo (scanning mirrors) | Galvo (scanning mirrors) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Wavelength | 355 nm | 355 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 10 W | 5 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 200 × 200 mm | 50 × 50 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 200 mm | 50 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 200 mm | 50 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 400 cm² | 25 cm² |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | 15,000 mm/s | 15,000 mm/s |
| Max cutting depth – wood / plywood (one pass) | 10 mm | — |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | 0.15 mm | 0.1 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | No |
| Emergency stop button | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | Yes |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | Yes |
| Water cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | USB |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, EZCAD2 | LightBurn |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 350 mm |
| Depth | — | 636 mm |
| Height | — | 638 mm |
| Rated power consumption | 675 W | 675 W |
