- Processing Talk
- Compare
- EC 60W vs HEXA
Cloudray EC 60W vs FLUX HEXA
What EC 60W does better (0) and where HEXA wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is EC 60W better than HEXA?
EC 60W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is HEXA better than EC 60W?
- Work area (surface)441 cm² vs 2,993 cm²6.8×
- Built-in cameraNo · EC 60W: Yes
- Work area width (X)210 mm vs 730 mm3.5×
- Wi-FiNo · EC 60W: Yes
- Work area depth (Y)210 mm vs 410 mm+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | CO2 (10.6 µm) | CO2 (10.6 µm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | — |
| Wavelength | — | 10,640 nm |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 60 W | 60 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 210 × 210 mm | 730 × 410 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 210 mm | 730 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 210 mm | 410 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 441 cm² | 2,993 cm² |
| Pass-through slot | No | — |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 900 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | — | 0.2 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | — |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen / control panel | — | Yes |
| Water cooling | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | USB, Wi-Fi, Ethernet |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | Beam Studio |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 1,110 mm |
| Depth | — | 670 mm |
| Height | — | 273 mm |
| Weight | — | 58 kg |
| Rated power consumption | 750 W | — |
