- Processing Talk
- Compare
- EC 30W vs Beambox 40W
Cloudray EC 30W vs FLUX Beambox 40W
What EC 30W does better (0) and where Beambox 40W wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.2Power & cutting2.6
2.2Work area3.2
4.7Safety4.7
3.1Features & ease of use9.5
Why is EC 30W better than Beambox 40W?
EC 30W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Beambox 40W better than EC 30W?
- Work area (surface)441 cm² vs 1,500 cm²3.4×
- Laser output power30 W vs 40 W+33%
- Built-in cameraNo · EC 30W: Yes
- Wi-FiNo · EC 30W: Yes
- Work area width (X)210 mm vs 400 mm+90%
- Work area depth (Y)210 mm vs 375 mm+79%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | CO2 (10.6 µm) | CO2 (10.6 µm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | — |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 30 W | 40 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 210 × 210 mm | 400 × 375 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 210 mm | 400 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 210 mm | 375 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 441 cm² | 1,500 cm² |
| Pass-through slot | No | — |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 305 mm/s |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | — |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen / control panel | — | Yes |
| Water cooling | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | USB | USB, Wi-Fi, Ethernet |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn | Beam Studio |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| File formats | — | JPG, PNG, SVG, DXF |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 250 mm |
| Depth | — | 830 mm |
| Height | — | 670 mm |
| Weight | — | 40 kg |
| Rated power consumption | 750 W | — |
