- Processing Talk
- Compare
- Swift vs Ray7S 40W
AtomStack Swift vs Longer Ray7S 40W
What Swift does better (0) and where Ray7S 40W wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is Swift better than Ray7S 40W?
Swift has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Ray7S 40W better than Swift?
- Laser output power7 W vs 40 W5.7×
- Enclosed (fully covered)No · Swift: Yes
- Work area (surface)900 cm² vs 946 cm²+5%
- Work area depth (Y)300 mm vs 310 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Laser sources | Blue diode (≈455 nm) | Blue diode (≈455 nm) |
| Motion system | Gantry (XY rails) | Gantry (XY rails) |
| Two laser sources | No | No |
| Laser power | ||
| Laser output power | 7 W | 40 W |
| Work area | ||
| Work area | 300 × 300 mm | 305 × 310 mm |
| Work area width (X) | 300 mm | 305 mm |
| Work area depth (Y) | 300 mm | 310 mm |
| Work area (surface) | 900 cm² | 946 cm² |
| Work-area extension kit | Yes | — |
| Speed & cutting | ||
| Max engraving / travel speed | — | 600 mm/s |
| Precision | ||
| Laser spot size | — | 0.06 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Enclosed (fully covered) | No | Yes |
| Laser safety class | — | Class 1 (eye-safe, enclosed) |
| Flame / fire detection | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Air assist | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Autofocus / auto height | No | No |
| Rotary attachment support | Yes | — |
| Offline engraving (no computer) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & software | ||
| Connections | — | Wi-Fi |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Compatible software | LightBurn, AtomStack Studio | — |
| LightBurn compatible | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | — |
